The Lemon Index

Trucks & diesel engines · Ford F-150 reliability by year

F-150 engines: 2.7 vs 3.5 EcoBoost vs 5.0.

Ford doesn't report F-150 sales by engine, so nobody can honestly say which engine breaks more per truck. What we can show: what owners of each one complain about, from 18,026 complaints matched to the engine by VIN. The 3.5 EcoBoost gen 1 draws the biggest share of engine complaints (26%), the 5.0 Coyote V8 the smallest (13%).

Side by side

2.7 EcoBoost3.5 EcoBoost gen 13.5 EcoBoost gen 25.0 Coyote V8
Model years2015–262011–162017–252011–26
Complaints (VIN-matched)2,4806,2523,4565,838
Name the engine18%26%25%13%
Name the transmission / drivetrain32%33%41%44%
Say the engine stalled, shut off or lost power12%19%9.3%15%
Mention an oil leak1.8%0.2%1.4%0.3%
Mention burning or losing oil0.3%under 0.1%0.3%1.8%
Mention a cam phaser or a rattle at start-up0.2%1.1%15%0.6%
Mention the timing chain0.1%2.2%1.8%0.3%
Mention a misfire0.9%2.7%0.3%0.4%
Mention intercooler condensation0.2%1.6%0.1%0.1%
Middle mileage at the report42,00060,00053,00068,000
Recalls that name it1351

Every percentage is a share of that engine's own complaints, counted from the area owners pick and their own words. The 3.5 EcoBoost changed in 2017 (2nd generation, with port injection added), so it has two columns. Raptor (High Output), PowerBoost hybrid and Lightning complaints are left out.

What stands out

  • 2.7 EcoBoost: oil leaks (the oil pan on early trucks), 44 of 2,480 complaints (1.8%) against a 0.3% median for the others.
  • 2.7 EcoBoost: coolant leaks, 39 of 2,480 complaints (1.6%) against a 1.0% median for the others.
  • 3.5 EcoBoost gen 1: intercooler condensation (misfire or stumble under load), 97 of 6,252 complaints (1.6%) against a 0.1% median for the others.
  • 3.5 EcoBoost gen 1: timing chain stretch, 137 of 6,252 complaints (2.2%) against a 0.3% median for the others.
  • 3.5 EcoBoost gen 1: misfires, 166 of 6,252 complaints (2.7%) against a 0.4% median for the others.
  • 3.5 EcoBoost gen 2: cam phaser rattle at cold start, 526 of 3,456 complaints (15%) against a 0.6% median for the others.
  • 3.5 EcoBoost gen 2: the timing chain, 61 of 3,456 complaints (1.8%) against a 0.3% median for the others.
  • 5.0 Coyote V8: oil consumption, 108 of 5,838 complaints (1.8%) against a 0.3% median for the others.

Only problems at least 1.5× the median of the other F-150 engines, with 10+ complaints.

Complaints by model year and engine

Model year2.7 EcoBoost3.5 EcoBoost gen 13.5 EcoBoost gen 25.0 Coyote V8
2011—1,137—604
2012—988—475
2013—1,630—900
2014—822—484
2015308860—435
2016464815—633
2017259—689434
2018521—974690
2019248—571419
2020221—256220
2021258—402249
202292—263138
202366—17992
202419—10334
202521—1927
20263——4

Counts filed so far, not rates: the 3.5 EcoBoost sold the most, so it draws the most.

Each engine

Source: NHTSA owner complaints (FLAT_CMPL + COMPLAINTS_RECEIVED_2025-2026), received through 20261109; engines: NHTSA vPIC VIN decoder (VIN position 8); NHTSA recalls API.

Quick answers

Which F-150 engine is the most reliable?

Ford doesn't report F-150 sales by engine, so nobody can honestly say which engine breaks more per truck. What we can show: what owners of each one complain about, from 18,026 complaints matched to the engine by VIN. The 3.5 EcoBoost gen 1 draws the biggest share of engine complaints (26%), the 5.0 Coyote V8 the smallest (13%).

Is the 2.7 EcoBoost better than the 3.5?

By the share of owner complaints that name the engine: 2.7 18%, 3.5 gen 1 26%, 3.5 gen 2 25%. Shares, not failure rates.

Is the 5.0 Coyote more reliable than the EcoBoost?

The 5.0's complaints name the engine 13% of the time. Compare the table: each column is that engine's own complaints.

Free to use with credit: Source: The Lemon Index (lemonindex.com). Get the data

Spot a mistake or have an idea? Tell us

How can we make Lemon Index better?